Tuesday 14 April 2015

More on "Eating the tithe"



If you have not read the comments on the previous post, I encourage you to do so. The summary I gave of tithing in general did leave me open to justifiable criticism. I certainly do not want to imply that we are still under the law in the sense that Paul uses this phrase. The idea that we are to tithe as an obligation under the Law is not held by me. I make the point that the Old Testament laws have principles behind them that we are to embrace with joy and gladness. The New Testament teaching on giving is about being a cheerful, generous giver since everything  belongs to the Lord.

The task of finding the principle behind many of the Old Testament passages, and indeed of the New Testament as well, calls for an enquiring mind under the control of the Holy Spirit. Our minds are to be renewed (Eph 4:23, Col 3:10), not ignored. If we now have the mind of Christ (1 Cor 2:16) then we will be able to ask the right questions and get the right answers. We must not fall into the trap of anti-intellectualism.

A tithe is a token. It is the baseline if you like, of our giving. We are called to go beyond that and give all that we have to the Lord; to ask ‘what can I keep’, not ‘what can I give’.

Translating this into our time and space leads us along an interesting path. 

Firstly, If we are to bring the WHOLE tithe into the storehouse, then where is the storehouse. I used to think this was the local church, but now I am convinced that the storehouse is Jesus himself. We are to bring it to Him so He can decide where the needs are that need to come out of that storehouse.
Secondly, what are the practicalities that come from this?

This takes us back to the Book of Deuteronomy.
Deu 14:22-29 HCSB  "Each year you are to set aside a tenth of all the produce grown in your fields.  (23)  You are to eat a tenth of your grain, new wine, and oil, and the firstborn of your herd and flock, in the presence of Yahweh your God at the place where He chooses to have His name dwell, so that you will always learn to fear the LORD your God.  (24)  But if the distance is too great for you to carry it, since the place where Yahweh your God chooses to put His name is too far away from you and since the LORD your God has blessed you,  (25)  then exchange it for money, take the money in your hand, and go to the place the LORD your God chooses.  (26)  You may spend the money on anything you want: cattle, sheep, wine, beer, or anything you desire. You are to feast there in the presence of the LORD your God and rejoice with your family.  (27)  Do not neglect the Levite within your gates, since he has no portion or inheritance among you.  (28)  "At the end of every three years, bring a tenth of all your produce for that year and store it within your gates.  (29)  Then the Levite, who has no portion or inheritance among you, the foreigner, the fatherless, and the widow within your gates may come, eat, and be satisfied. And the LORD your God will bless you in all the work of your hands that you do.

There are several points to note here:

  • 1.       They were to eat the tithe, or its financial equivalent, in the presence of the Lord and where He decreed.
  • 2.      They were to learn the fear of the Lord through this.
  • 3.      There was no restriction on what they were to spend the money on.
  • 4.      We are to rejoice with our family in this activity.
  • 5.      The tithe that went to the Levites was for their support and for the relief of poverty.

The question of the third year distribution has been discussed by scholars for some time, and it seems that they believe there were two tithes, possibly at the beginning and end of the harvest. The first was for the Levites alone to receive and the other was the one we are discussing here. I think this is speculation based on Rabbinical teaching. However I don’t want to get caught up in this. I will stick with the five points above.

It seems to me that we can distil the following principles for us from this passage.

  • 1.       Serving and giving to the Lord is a joyful thing.
  • 2.      God’s love is so great, and His mercy so strong, that what we give to Him, He gives back to us, and even more.
Even in the question of the Sabbath, Jesus said that the Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath. Joy is such a common word in the New Testament. Those of us who love Jesus with a passion know how joyful this is, even in the midst of trial and difficulty.
  • 3.      We are to remember Him around the table. That was the original point of the Lord’s Supper, not a ritual to be carried out symbolically. This should be done every time we gather around a table for a meal. But especially so, as a grand event, at certain times of the year.
After all, the Sabbath Seder was a recounting of the Exodus each week in Jewish homes. This was a full meal and a joyful occasion every week, in the family, and still is today. The father took time to teach the household about the Lord and His provision for them.

Family is in the forefront here, and the teaching of God’s ways is done faithfully in the family, each week, at this meal.

I remember with gladness the times when our children were very young, how Elizabeth and I had structured times each week teaching our children. In our case it was not over a meal, unless you call “Poppy’s  pancakes” a meal. But it was a structured time when I inputted to the children at least as much as I did to the church I pastored.

  • 4.      There was to be  a real provision for the poor. I can hear clearly Paul’s admonition in  Cor 11.

1Co 11:18-22 NIV  In the first place, I hear that when you come together as a church, there are divisions among you, and to some extent I believe it.  (19)  No doubt there have to be differences among you to show which of you have God's approval.  (20)  So then, when you come together, it is not the Lord's Supper you eat,  (21)  for when you are eating, some of you go ahead with your own private suppers. As a result, one person remains hungry and another gets drunk.  (22)  Don't you have homes to eat and drink in? Or do you despise the church of God by humiliating those who have nothing? What shall I say to you? Shall I praise you? Certainly not in this matter!

The Corinthian Church did not even seem to notice the poor in their midst as they feasted in the presence of the Lord. There was to be a special provision made for those people who are often not even noticed.


Let me try to pull this together.

1.       Our financial giving is to be generous (absolutely more than a tithe) and given willingly and joyfully.

2.      There can be no guilt associated with our giving. Giving to the Lord is one of the ways He wants to bless us and how He wants us to enjoy our giving in many ways, some of which are:

a.      In our gatherings to remember Jesus for all He has done for us, we can use what the Holy Spirit has given us and what we have ‘given’ Him, to have a joyful meal at whatever level we decide is most appropriate. Remembering Him in this context does not mean a cursory saying of ‘grace’ before the meal, but a meal centred on Him. Our conversation is to be about Him, teaching &/or testimony, worship, prayer, etc.

Maybe this can be one new form of ‘church’, held entirely within the framework of a meal.

b.      These are not to be exclusive gatherings and should include those who have little or nothing, without expecting them, or anyone else for that matter, to contribute anything at all to the meal.

After all this is a foretaste of the marriage supper of the Lamb!

c.       Outside of all of this we are also to use our giving to the Lord to alleviate poverty and suffering.

There are so many calls on our financial resources today, that we cannot give to everyone. This is where we need to hear the voice of the Holy Spirit to show us where this money is to go.

d.      In all of this we must be led by the Holy Spirit, otherwise it will all become carnal and meaningless as it seems to have become in Corinth.




Commentary Notes on Deuteronomy 26:12-13


Keil & Delitzsch

The delivery of the tithes, like the presentation of the first-fruits, was also to be sanctified by prayer before the Lord. It is true that only a prayer after taking the second tithe in the third year is commanded here; but that is simply because this tithe was appropriated everywhere throughout the land to festal meals for the poor and destitute (Deu 14:28), when prayer before the Lord would not follow per analogiam from the previous injunction concerning the presentation of first-fruits, as it would in the case of the tithes with which sacrificial meals were prepared at the sanctuary (Deu 14:22.). לַעְשֵׂר is the infinitive Hiphil for לְהַעֲשַׂר, as in Neh 10:39 (on this form, vid., Ges. §53, 3 Anm. 2 and 7, and Ew. §131, b. and 244, b.). “Saying before the Lord” does not denote prayer in the sanctuary (at the tabernacle), but, as in Gen 27:7, simply prayer before God the omnipresent One, who is enthroned in heaven (Deu 26:15), and blesses His people from above from His holy habitation. The declaration of having fulfilled the commandments of God refers primarily to the directions concerning the tithes, and was such a rendering of an account as springs from the consciousness that a man very easily transgresses the commandments of God, and has nothing in common with the blindness of pharisaic self-righteousness “I have cleaned out the holy out of my house:” the holy is that which is sanctified to God, that which belongs to the Lord and His servants, as in Lev 21:22. בִּעֵר signifies not only to remove, but to clean out, wipe out. That which was sanctified to God appeared as a debt, which was to be wiped out of a man's house (Schultz).


Matthew Henry

Concerning the disposal of their tithe the third year we had the law before, Deu 14:28, Deu 14:29. The second tithe, which in the other two years was to be spent in extraordinaries at the feasts, was to be spent the third year at home, in entertaining the poor. Now because this was done from under the eye of the priests, and a great confidence was put in the people's honesty, that they would dispose of it according to the law, to the Levite, the stranger, and the fatherless (Deu 26:12), it is therefore required that when at the next feast after they appeared before the Lord they should there testify (as it were) upon oath, in a religious manner, that they had fully administered, and been true to their trust.





More comments and interactions please.

2 comments:

  1. Part 1 ****

    Hi John
    There’s one point I would like you to clarify:

    On one hand you say that “our financial giving is to be generous (absolutely more than a tithe) and given willingly and joyfully”. On the other hand you mention that “there can be no guilt associated with our giving.” I feel there’s a conflict in those statements.
    In my opinion the issue of guilt is associated with the law. The law requires the tithing as a requirement and that’s where the compulsion comes from. But again, I stand by 2 Cor 9:8:

    “Each one must do just as he has purposed in his heart, not grudgingly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver.”
    The moment you set a minimum amount to giving you are indirectly adding a requirement. It’s like saying “you are free to give as long as it is more than the tithe”. I am not so sure about this type of freedom.

    Why are we setting the law as a starting point for our actions? I can’t see this attitude in the New Testament where Paul urges churches to give above tithing or to use the law as a starting point. Should we tell people that they should at least be circumcised besides removing the sin from their heart? Why are we still hanging on to the law? The law brings bondage but we believers are urged to walk in the freedom that Jesus has given us. (Gal 5:1) We are encouraged to walk by the Spirit. Those who are led by the Spirit, are not under the law (Gal 5:18). The law is a tutor to bring us to Christ, but now that we have found Him there is a new way of living.

    Remember the entire law is summed in love for God and love for others. It is only through the Holy Spirit that we are empowered to satisfy the underlying motives of the law of God instead of being tangled up with the written code of the law.

    I have heard from people in church leadership justifying their badgering people to give on the fact that unless they compel people to give the congregation would not do it otherwise. Isn’t this an affront to what Jesus has performed on the cross? We have been crucified with Him so that we may bring forth good fruit through his resurrection. We need to allow people to respond to the quickening of the Holy Spirit in their lives and believe that they are indeed a new creation capable and empowered to do what is good. It is only as we walk in the freedom of the Holy Spirit that you can actually fulfil the law. God is not concerned with percentages, instead He’s interested in what comes of our hearts.

    As Paul talks about circumcision I also like to refer to tithing:

    For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision mean anything, but faith working through love. The amount of your giving is not an issue before God. The big issue is greed and unkindness. You could give more than 10% and still nourish greed and unkindness. You pass the technical giving test but fail badly the heart test.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Part 2 ****

    Let’s see what happened in the Ananias and Sapphira case: believers were selling properties and bringing the proceeds to the apostles to meet the needs of those who were in need. Ananias and Sapphira sold a piece of property but kept back some of the price for himself. He wanted to make the apostles think that he was giving the whole proceeds of the sale. By keeping part of the money from the sale he acted in a deceitful manner by lying. Most certainly he would have deposited far more than 10 percent so it would look like the whole amount. We know from the story that he was struck dead for what he had done.
    Now let’s think about it: did Peter judge him for breaking the law of tithing? Not at all. The issue here was completely in his heart as we see in verse 4: “Why is it that you have conceived this deed in your heart?”
    Peter didn’t rebuke him for keeping the tithe but for lying to the Holy Spirit. But was he obliged to give any thing? My answer is no and will explain. Check verse 4 again where Peter tells him: “While it remained unsold, did it not remain your own? And after it is was sold, was it not under you control?” This tells me that even before and after the sale of the property everything was still his. There’s no reference to tithing here at all. Ananias was free to keep the entire amount of the sale to himself if he wanted.

    One can’t force someone to be generous – this has to be the result of a transformed life by the power of Jesus Christ. One of the most astonishing and glorious things I’ve found in Christian living is seeing believers responding to the law of the Spirit written in their hearts and minds and not to the law written on tablets of stone. How refreshing to see believers responding willingly and living according to their new nature. What is the new nature? Isn’t it love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness and self-control? Those who live in such a way do not need the law for they fulfil those requirements right from the heart.

    ReplyDelete