If you have not read the comments on the previous post, I
encourage you to do so. The summary I gave of tithing in general did leave me
open to justifiable criticism. I certainly do not want to imply that we are still under the
law in the sense that Paul uses this phrase. The idea that we are to tithe as
an obligation under the Law is not held by me. I make the point that the Old
Testament laws have principles behind them that we are to embrace with joy and
gladness. The New Testament teaching on giving is about being a cheerful,
generous giver since everything belongs to the Lord.
The task of finding the principle behind many of the Old
Testament passages, and indeed of the New Testament as well, calls for an
enquiring mind under the control of the Holy Spirit. Our minds are to be
renewed (Eph 4:23, Col 3:10), not ignored. If we now have the mind of Christ (1
Cor 2:16) then we will be able to ask the right questions and get the right
answers. We must not fall into the trap of anti-intellectualism.
A tithe is a token. It is the baseline if you like, of our
giving. We are called to go beyond that and give all that we have to the Lord;
to ask ‘what can I keep’, not ‘what can I give’.
Translating this into our time and space leads us along an
interesting path.
Firstly, If we
are to bring the WHOLE tithe into the storehouse, then where is the storehouse.
I used to think this was the local church, but now I am convinced that the storehouse
is Jesus himself. We are to bring it to Him so He can decide where the needs
are that need to come out of that storehouse.
Secondly, what
are the practicalities that come from this?
This takes us back to the Book of Deuteronomy.
Deu 14:22-29 HCSB "Each year you are to set aside a tenth
of all the produce grown in your fields.
(23)
You are to eat a tenth of your
grain, new wine, and oil, and the firstborn of your herd and flock, in the
presence of Yahweh your God at the place where He chooses to have His name
dwell, so that you will always learn to fear the LORD your God. (24) But if the distance is too great for you to
carry it, since the place where Yahweh your God chooses to put His name is too
far away from you and since the LORD your God has blessed you, (25) then exchange it for money, take the money in
your hand, and go to the place the LORD your God chooses. (26) You
may spend the money on anything you want: cattle, sheep, wine, beer, or
anything you desire. You are to feast there in the presence of the LORD your
God and rejoice with your family. (27) Do not
neglect the Levite within your gates, since he has no portion or inheritance
among you. (28) "At
the end of every three years, bring a
tenth of all your produce for that year and store it
within your gates. (29) Then the
Levite, who has no portion or inheritance among you, the foreigner, the
fatherless, and the widow within your gates may come, eat, and be satisfied.
And the LORD your God will bless you in all the work of your hands that you do.
There are several points to
note here:
- 1. They were to eat the tithe, or its financial equivalent, in the presence of the Lord and where He decreed.
- 2. They were to learn the fear of the Lord through this.
- 3. There was no restriction on what they were to spend the money on.
- 4. We are to rejoice with our family in this activity.
- 5. The tithe that went to the Levites was for their support and for the relief of poverty.
The question of the third year
distribution has been discussed by scholars for some time, and it seems that
they believe there were two tithes, possibly at the beginning and end of the
harvest. The first was for the Levites alone to receive and the other was the
one we are discussing here. I think this is speculation based on Rabbinical
teaching. However I don’t want to get caught up in this. I will stick with the
five points above.
It seems to me that we can
distil the following principles for us from this passage.
- 1. Serving and giving to the Lord is a joyful thing.
- 2. God’s love is so great, and His mercy so strong, that what we give to Him, He gives back to us, and even more.
- 3. We are to remember Him around the table. That was the original point of the Lord’s Supper, not a ritual to be carried out symbolically. This should be done every time we gather around a table for a meal. But especially so, as a grand event, at certain times of the year.
Family is in the forefront here, and the teaching of God’s ways is done faithfully in the family, each week, at this meal.
I remember with gladness the times when our children were very young, how Elizabeth and I had structured times each week teaching our children. In our case it was not over a meal, unless you call “Poppy’s pancakes” a meal. But it was a structured time when I inputted to the children at least as much as I did to the church I pastored.
- 4. There was to be a real provision for the poor. I can hear clearly Paul’s admonition in Cor 11.
1Co
11:18-22 NIV In the first place, I hear that when you come
together as a church, there are divisions among you, and to some extent I
believe it. (19) No doubt there have to be differences among
you to show which of you have God's approval.
(20)
So then, when you come together, it is not the Lord's Supper you
eat, (21) for when you are eating, some of you go ahead
with your own private suppers. As a result, one person remains hungry and
another gets drunk. (22) Don't you
have homes to eat and drink in? Or do you despise the church of God by
humiliating those who have nothing? What shall I say to you? Shall I praise
you? Certainly not in this matter!
The Corinthian Church did not even seem to notice
the poor in their midst as they feasted in the presence of the Lord. There was
to be a special provision made for those people who are often not even noticed.
Let me try to pull this together.
1.
Our financial giving is to be generous
(absolutely more than a tithe) and given willingly and joyfully.
2.
There can be no guilt associated with our giving.
Giving to the Lord is one of the ways He wants to bless us and how He wants us
to enjoy our giving in many ways, some of which are:
a.
In our gatherings to remember Jesus for all He has
done for us, we can use what the Holy Spirit has given us and what we have ‘given’
Him, to have a joyful meal at whatever level we decide is most appropriate.
Remembering Him in this context does not mean a cursory saying of ‘grace’
before the meal, but a meal centred on Him. Our conversation is to be about
Him, teaching &/or testimony, worship, prayer, etc.
Maybe this can be one new form of ‘church’, held entirely within the framework of a meal.
Maybe this can be one new form of ‘church’, held entirely within the framework of a meal.
b.
These are not to be exclusive gatherings and
should include those who have little or nothing, without expecting them, or anyone
else for that matter, to contribute anything at all to the meal.
After all this is a foretaste of the marriage supper of the Lamb!
After all this is a foretaste of the marriage supper of the Lamb!
c.
Outside of all of this we are also to use our
giving to the Lord to alleviate poverty and suffering.
There are so many calls on our financial resources today, that we cannot give to everyone. This is where we need to hear the voice of the Holy Spirit to show us where this money is to go.
There are so many calls on our financial resources today, that we cannot give to everyone. This is where we need to hear the voice of the Holy Spirit to show us where this money is to go.
d.
In all of this we must be led by the Holy Spirit,
otherwise it will all become carnal and meaningless as it seems to have become
in Corinth.
Commentary Notes on Deuteronomy 26:12-13
Keil & Delitzsch
The delivery of the
tithes, like the presentation of the first-fruits, was also to be sanctified by
prayer before the Lord. It is true that only a prayer after taking the second
tithe in the third year is commanded here; but that is simply because this
tithe was appropriated everywhere throughout the land to festal meals for the
poor and destitute (Deu 14:28), when prayer before the Lord would not follow per analogiam from the previous injunction concerning the
presentation of first-fruits, as it would in the case of the tithes with which
sacrificial meals were prepared at the sanctuary (Deu 14:22.). לַעְשֵׂר is the infinitive Hiphil for לְהַעֲשַׂר, as in Neh 10:39 (on this form, vid., Ges.
§53, 3 Anm. 2 and 7, and Ew. §131, b. and 244, b.). “Saying before the
Lord” does not denote prayer in the sanctuary (at the tabernacle), but, as in Gen 27:7, simply prayer before God the omnipresent One, who is
enthroned in heaven (Deu 26:15), and blesses His people from above from His holy
habitation. The declaration of having fulfilled the commandments of God refers
primarily to the directions concerning the tithes, and was such a rendering of
an account as springs from the consciousness that a man very easily
transgresses the commandments of God, and has nothing in common with the
blindness of pharisaic self-righteousness “I have cleaned out the holy out of my house:” the holy is that which is sanctified to God, that
which belongs to the Lord and His servants, as in Lev 21:22. בִּעֵר signifies not only to remove, but to clean out, wipe
out. That which was sanctified to God appeared as a debt, which was to be wiped
out of a man's house (Schultz).
Matthew
Henry
Concerning the disposal
of their tithe the third year we had the law before, Deu 14:28, Deu 14:29. The second tithe, which in the other two years was
to be spent in extraordinaries at the feasts, was to be spent the third year at
home, in entertaining the poor. Now because this was done from under the eye of
the priests, and a great confidence was put in the people's honesty, that they
would dispose of it according to the law, to the Levite, the stranger, and the fatherless (Deu 26:12), it is therefore required that when at the next
feast after they appeared before the Lord they should there testify (as it were) upon oath, in
a religious manner, that they had fully administered, and been true to their
trust.
More comments and interactions
please.
Part 1 ****
ReplyDeleteHi John
There’s one point I would like you to clarify:
On one hand you say that “our financial giving is to be generous (absolutely more than a tithe) and given willingly and joyfully”. On the other hand you mention that “there can be no guilt associated with our giving.” I feel there’s a conflict in those statements.
In my opinion the issue of guilt is associated with the law. The law requires the tithing as a requirement and that’s where the compulsion comes from. But again, I stand by 2 Cor 9:8:
“Each one must do just as he has purposed in his heart, not grudgingly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver.”
The moment you set a minimum amount to giving you are indirectly adding a requirement. It’s like saying “you are free to give as long as it is more than the tithe”. I am not so sure about this type of freedom.
Why are we setting the law as a starting point for our actions? I can’t see this attitude in the New Testament where Paul urges churches to give above tithing or to use the law as a starting point. Should we tell people that they should at least be circumcised besides removing the sin from their heart? Why are we still hanging on to the law? The law brings bondage but we believers are urged to walk in the freedom that Jesus has given us. (Gal 5:1) We are encouraged to walk by the Spirit. Those who are led by the Spirit, are not under the law (Gal 5:18). The law is a tutor to bring us to Christ, but now that we have found Him there is a new way of living.
Remember the entire law is summed in love for God and love for others. It is only through the Holy Spirit that we are empowered to satisfy the underlying motives of the law of God instead of being tangled up with the written code of the law.
I have heard from people in church leadership justifying their badgering people to give on the fact that unless they compel people to give the congregation would not do it otherwise. Isn’t this an affront to what Jesus has performed on the cross? We have been crucified with Him so that we may bring forth good fruit through his resurrection. We need to allow people to respond to the quickening of the Holy Spirit in their lives and believe that they are indeed a new creation capable and empowered to do what is good. It is only as we walk in the freedom of the Holy Spirit that you can actually fulfil the law. God is not concerned with percentages, instead He’s interested in what comes of our hearts.
As Paul talks about circumcision I also like to refer to tithing:
For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision mean anything, but faith working through love. The amount of your giving is not an issue before God. The big issue is greed and unkindness. You could give more than 10% and still nourish greed and unkindness. You pass the technical giving test but fail badly the heart test.
Part 2 ****
ReplyDeleteLet’s see what happened in the Ananias and Sapphira case: believers were selling properties and bringing the proceeds to the apostles to meet the needs of those who were in need. Ananias and Sapphira sold a piece of property but kept back some of the price for himself. He wanted to make the apostles think that he was giving the whole proceeds of the sale. By keeping part of the money from the sale he acted in a deceitful manner by lying. Most certainly he would have deposited far more than 10 percent so it would look like the whole amount. We know from the story that he was struck dead for what he had done.
Now let’s think about it: did Peter judge him for breaking the law of tithing? Not at all. The issue here was completely in his heart as we see in verse 4: “Why is it that you have conceived this deed in your heart?”
Peter didn’t rebuke him for keeping the tithe but for lying to the Holy Spirit. But was he obliged to give any thing? My answer is no and will explain. Check verse 4 again where Peter tells him: “While it remained unsold, did it not remain your own? And after it is was sold, was it not under you control?” This tells me that even before and after the sale of the property everything was still his. There’s no reference to tithing here at all. Ananias was free to keep the entire amount of the sale to himself if he wanted.
One can’t force someone to be generous – this has to be the result of a transformed life by the power of Jesus Christ. One of the most astonishing and glorious things I’ve found in Christian living is seeing believers responding to the law of the Spirit written in their hearts and minds and not to the law written on tablets of stone. How refreshing to see believers responding willingly and living according to their new nature. What is the new nature? Isn’t it love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness and self-control? Those who live in such a way do not need the law for they fulfil those requirements right from the heart.